<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Are Not A Designer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/</link>
	<description>An Emersian Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:07:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-119</guid>
		<description>&quot;Designer&quot; isn&#039;t just a word, its a concept. &quot;Plumber&quot; is a word that inspires confidence that the individual posesses the expertise needed to successfully install and troubleshoot the plumbing in a building or structure. This isn&#039;t simply knowing how to lock pipes together with putty and a wrench. In this same vein, &quot;Designer&quot; inspires a certain confidence that the individual has spent time not just perfecting the technical aspects of web creation but additionally has the ability to envision an entire solution that addresses both aesthetic and functional concerns. This simply doesn&#039;t happen (not as often as the webdesign awards would have us think) without some education (formal is my preference, critique is so important) of practical design elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Designer&#8221; isn&#8217;t just a word, its a concept. &#8220;Plumber&#8221; is a word that inspires confidence that the individual posesses the expertise needed to successfully install and troubleshoot the plumbing in a building or structure. This isn&#8217;t simply knowing how to lock pipes together with putty and a wrench. In this same vein, &#8220;Designer&#8221; inspires a certain confidence that the individual has spent time not just perfecting the technical aspects of web creation but additionally has the ability to envision an entire solution that addresses both aesthetic and functional concerns. This simply doesn&#8217;t happen (not as often as the webdesign awards would have us think) without some education (formal is my preference, critique is so important) of practical design elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Artist vs. The Designer &#124; homer gaines</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>The Artist vs. The Designer &#124; homer gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] was reading an article &#8220;You Are Not A Designer&#8221; and it stirred up some feelings in me on he subject that I have been wanti9ng to explore. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was reading an article &#8220;You Are Not A Designer&#8221; and it stirred up some feelings in me on he subject that I have been wanti9ng to explore. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xirclebox</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>xirclebox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I think what&#039;s going on here is that we have “The Artist” vs. “The Designer” and the way applications are used. The Artist is only concerned with the look and feel of the creation whereas The Designer is concerned about both the look and feel as well as the techincal details required to make the creation work.  The Artist is someone who uses these applications to only create what Designers build.  Is the ability to create something Boolean? Yes. You either created it or not. But to design something such as a UI is to have an understanding of “how” or the “purpose” for creating said UI. The path to understanding design is not found in the &quot;tools&quot; drop down menu.

Not to take anything away from those who use applications to get the job done. I designed my first web site back in &#039;94 using Photoshop and wrote the HTML by hand using Pico. Today I use the Adobe Creative Suite to build sites, however I also know the code and can do it by hand. But as projects grew and time lines shrunk these tools proved their usefulness.

I feel those Artists who use applications and wear the &quot;Designer&quot; badge can be classified as either: Novice, Advanced User, Expert.

The Novice is just starting out. They will most likely be using some WYSIWYG because it helps speed up the process. They may be doing this as a hobby or it could be a career move for them as some point.

The Advanced User is not all that new to the game and is very good at using the applications to achieve their goals like the &quot;Painter&quot; Stevie mentioned. They may have a formal background in the arts but don&#039;t &quot;waste&quot; time with learning things outside of their box. &quot;Just let the application do it for me.&quot;

The Expert is the person who knows what&#039;s going on up top and under the hood. They know why the code is behaving a certain way, they know why it&#039;s best to use a certain technique in Photoshop over another. They may be formally trained in the arts or computers but have taken the steps to learn or become familiar with the details outside of their box.

In any case, to be able to create something takes initiative and talent.
Does that mean the end result is any less important? Not if serves it&#039;s purpose.

My Mother, Pat Gaines-Mills is a very accomplished Artist who went to school to study Art and now has work hanging all over Indiana and abroad. Me, I’m an accomplished Designer who went to school to study Psychology and has sites all over the web.

My Mom is great at painting anything from abstract compositions to the endangered Black Rhinos in Africa. But if you need an interactive presence I’m the one to call. Love you Mom :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what&#8217;s going on here is that we have “The Artist” vs. “The Designer” and the way applications are used. The Artist is only concerned with the look and feel of the creation whereas The Designer is concerned about both the look and feel as well as the techincal details required to make the creation work.  The Artist is someone who uses these applications to only create what Designers build.  Is the ability to create something Boolean? Yes. You either created it or not. But to design something such as a UI is to have an understanding of “how” or the “purpose” for creating said UI. The path to understanding design is not found in the &#8220;tools&#8221; drop down menu.</p>
<p>Not to take anything away from those who use applications to get the job done. I designed my first web site back in &#8216;94 using Photoshop and wrote the HTML by hand using Pico. Today I use the Adobe Creative Suite to build sites, however I also know the code and can do it by hand. But as projects grew and time lines shrunk these tools proved their usefulness.</p>
<p>I feel those Artists who use applications and wear the &#8220;Designer&#8221; badge can be classified as either: Novice, Advanced User, Expert.</p>
<p>The Novice is just starting out. They will most likely be using some WYSIWYG because it helps speed up the process. They may be doing this as a hobby or it could be a career move for them as some point.</p>
<p>The Advanced User is not all that new to the game and is very good at using the applications to achieve their goals like the &#8220;Painter&#8221; Stevie mentioned. They may have a formal background in the arts but don&#8217;t &#8220;waste&#8221; time with learning things outside of their box. &#8220;Just let the application do it for me.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Expert is the person who knows what&#8217;s going on up top and under the hood. They know why the code is behaving a certain way, they know why it&#8217;s best to use a certain technique in Photoshop over another. They may be formally trained in the arts or computers but have taken the steps to learn or become familiar with the details outside of their box.</p>
<p>In any case, to be able to create something takes initiative and talent.<br />
Does that mean the end result is any less important? Not if serves it&#8217;s purpose.</p>
<p>My Mother, Pat Gaines-Mills is a very accomplished Artist who went to school to study Art and now has work hanging all over Indiana and abroad. Me, I’m an accomplished Designer who went to school to study Psychology and has sites all over the web.</p>
<p>My Mom is great at painting anything from abstract compositions to the endangered Black Rhinos in Africa. But if you need an interactive presence I’m the one to call. Love you Mom :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1eighty &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What is design?</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>1eighty &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What is design?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] You are not a designer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You are not a designer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Short illustrative story: At a party, I met a painter. Painting fascinates me. I am not very good. I don&#039;t have the time. Anyways, he was also a self-taught web designer. So am I. The Internet was still in MUDDs and Chatrooms when I was in college. He asked me what programs I use. I told him I write code from scratch using CSS.  He looked puzzled and then asked me what CSS was. After I explained, he replied, &quot;The new Dreamweaver does all of that for me.&quot; I was speechless. So web design is now picking a template, modifying it and collecting a check. If this is okay with everyone, I will soon be out of a job. 

Defining a designer? I still wonder if I have learned enough coding, rules, and language descriptions to be a web designer. I have over 12 years experience as a graphic designer, and feel confident to call myself one. 

I don&#039;t think a title should be used unless the experience, employed position or education is there to back it up. If that isn&#039;t the case, then I am a painter. I am an illustrator. I am a writer. I am a print specialist. I am a computer technician. I am an accountant. Really. I am a nutritionist. I am a novelist. I am a journalist. All true. **smiles** 

If you want, you can place bad, awful or amateur in front of those titles, but I am still stealing the actual worth of those professionals by declaring myself one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short illustrative story: At a party, I met a painter. Painting fascinates me. I am not very good. I don&#8217;t have the time. Anyways, he was also a self-taught web designer. So am I. The Internet was still in MUDDs and Chatrooms when I was in college. He asked me what programs I use. I told him I write code from scratch using CSS.  He looked puzzled and then asked me what CSS was. After I explained, he replied, &#8220;The new Dreamweaver does all of that for me.&#8221; I was speechless. So web design is now picking a template, modifying it and collecting a check. If this is okay with everyone, I will soon be out of a job. </p>
<p>Defining a designer? I still wonder if I have learned enough coding, rules, and language descriptions to be a web designer. I have over 12 years experience as a graphic designer, and feel confident to call myself one. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a title should be used unless the experience, employed position or education is there to back it up. If that isn&#8217;t the case, then I am a painter. I am an illustrator. I am a writer. I am a print specialist. I am a computer technician. I am an accountant. Really. I am a nutritionist. I am a novelist. I am a journalist. All true. **smiles** </p>
<p>If you want, you can place bad, awful or amateur in front of those titles, but I am still stealing the actual worth of those professionals by declaring myself one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-57</guid>
		<description>@meme - you&#039;re forgetting that the titles of designer, developer, programmer, etc. are badges to be earned and then worn. Sort of like running a race and coming in 75th or in the top ten. You ran the race, sure, but you didn&#039;t come close to being among the elite who either have extraordinary talent and aptitude or who have paid their dues in training, hard work and gruelling practice. This elite are additionally and inevitably going to change the face of racing - introduce new techniques, regimens for preparation and indeed new races to be run.

Designers do so much more than put objects on a page. A true designer solves design problems on a form v. function continuum. They create problems to be solved. They break through boundaries never even perceived before they broke through.

I am not a designer. Not yet anyway. I can put together a decent website, and I can answer to my clients needs. I can make my client&#039;s cheezy and all together cliché ideas and turn them into something pleasing for their customers to browse, but I am not a designer. I have a long way to go before I solve any problems, before I create something truly unique, before I move the design world in any one direction.

I am, however, a student of design. Perhaps this is where most of us really are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@meme &#8211; you&#8217;re forgetting that the titles of designer, developer, programmer, etc. are badges to be earned and then worn. Sort of like running a race and coming in 75th or in the top ten. You ran the race, sure, but you didn&#8217;t come close to being among the elite who either have extraordinary talent and aptitude or who have paid their dues in training, hard work and gruelling practice. This elite are additionally and inevitably going to change the face of racing &#8211; introduce new techniques, regimens for preparation and indeed new races to be run.</p>
<p>Designers do so much more than put objects on a page. A true designer solves design problems on a form v. function continuum. They create problems to be solved. They break through boundaries never even perceived before they broke through.</p>
<p>I am not a designer. Not yet anyway. I can put together a decent website, and I can answer to my clients needs. I can make my client&#8217;s cheezy and all together cliché ideas and turn them into something pleasing for their customers to browse, but I am not a designer. I have a long way to go before I solve any problems, before I create something truly unique, before I move the design world in any one direction.</p>
<p>I am, however, a student of design. Perhaps this is where most of us really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I agree completely with your mindset, Scrivs. Just because you call yourself a designer, doesn&#039;t make it so. Design is a multi-dimensional idea. It includes form, function, feeling, etc.

As someone who teaches web languages, it&#039;s disappointing to me when a student comes into class armed with l33t Photoshop skillz and nothing else. No idea of whitespace usage, kerning, grids, or anything considered a staple of good design. To these students, &quot;design&quot; is about glossy buttons and subtle drop-shadows- not creating a cohesive solution.

I&#039;m not saying that Photoshop skills aren&#039;t important, I just think we tend to over-emphasize the &quot;pretty&quot; over the &quot;solution&quot;. Unfortunately, most clients want the &quot;pretty&quot; simply because they saw xyz site do it. Such is the life of a web designer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely with your mindset, Scrivs. Just because you call yourself a designer, doesn&#8217;t make it so. Design is a multi-dimensional idea. It includes form, function, feeling, etc.</p>
<p>As someone who teaches web languages, it&#8217;s disappointing to me when a student comes into class armed with l33t Photoshop skillz and nothing else. No idea of whitespace usage, kerning, grids, or anything considered a staple of good design. To these students, &#8220;design&#8221; is about glossy buttons and subtle drop-shadows- not creating a cohesive solution.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that Photoshop skills aren&#8217;t important, I just think we tend to over-emphasize the &#8220;pretty&#8221; over the &#8220;solution&#8221;. Unfortunately, most clients want the &#8220;pretty&#8221; simply because they saw xyz site do it. Such is the life of a web designer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meme</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>meme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-34</guid>
		<description>&quot;So having the ability to run makes you a runner? Having the ability to swim makes you a swimmer? Having the ability to sing makes you a singer? If that is how you define traits then you are correct in thinking that everyone is a designer.&quot;

I didnt say just having the ability, that is how you define traits and only people who design are designers not everyone!

You see Designer means someone who designs or is designing or is between designing, thats all the word means! if you add other words together to form sentences which add further meaning various words, like Web designer, Print Designer, Great Designer or Bad Designer etc.

What you and many other people do when discussing things like this is try to tag on &quot;further meaning&quot; to whatever word it is you&#039;re talking about.

You wouldn&#039;t put an article together called &quot;You are not a cleaner&quot; based on the amount of so called &quot;window cleaners&quot; that don&#039;t do it &quot;properly&quot;, they are cleaners, to elaborate they&#039;re terrible window cleaners.

Would a Clothes designer no longer be a designer if they didn&#039;t know about kerning or grids?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So having the ability to run makes you a runner? Having the ability to swim makes you a swimmer? Having the ability to sing makes you a singer? If that is how you define traits then you are correct in thinking that everyone is a designer.&#8221;</p>
<p>I didnt say just having the ability, that is how you define traits and only people who design are designers not everyone!</p>
<p>You see Designer means someone who designs or is designing or is between designing, thats all the word means! if you add other words together to form sentences which add further meaning various words, like Web designer, Print Designer, Great Designer or Bad Designer etc.</p>
<p>What you and many other people do when discussing things like this is try to tag on &#8220;further meaning&#8221; to whatever word it is you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>You wouldn&#8217;t put an article together called &#8220;You are not a cleaner&#8221; based on the amount of so called &#8220;window cleaners&#8221; that don&#8217;t do it &#8220;properly&#8221;, they are cleaners, to elaborate they&#8217;re terrible window cleaners.</p>
<p>Would a Clothes designer no longer be a designer if they didn&#8217;t know about kerning or grids?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d liken this to the difference between people who can play an instrument and musicians.  There&#039;s a marked difference.  

On one hand you&#039;ve got the group that can play an instrument with technical perfection, but not know anything about music other than how to read which note they need to play.  In fact, there&#039;s a lot of people that play in bands and have no idea how to even read music.  These would be the people that can execute a design without creating something new (or tailored to the situation/site.)

Then there&#039;s the other group that understands the how and the why of the music.  These are the ones who can hear a piece and come up with the harmony line, or a counterpoint to the melody.  They can immediately play a complimentary riff over a chord progression, or find a substitution in that progression that creates more interest.  These are the true designers.

There&#039;s something to be said about innate talent as well.  The smallest group is that which knows that something works, without understanding all the complexities to why.   Of course these people also tend to be the type that wants to find out why, and they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d liken this to the difference between people who can play an instrument and musicians.  There&#8217;s a marked difference.  </p>
<p>On one hand you&#8217;ve got the group that can play an instrument with technical perfection, but not know anything about music other than how to read which note they need to play.  In fact, there&#8217;s a lot of people that play in bands and have no idea how to even read music.  These would be the people that can execute a design without creating something new (or tailored to the situation/site.)</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the other group that understands the how and the why of the music.  These are the ones who can hear a piece and come up with the harmony line, or a counterpoint to the melody.  They can immediately play a complimentary riff over a chord progression, or find a substitution in that progression that creates more interest.  These are the true designers.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s something to be said about innate talent as well.  The smallest group is that which knows that something works, without understanding all the complexities to why.   Of course these people also tend to be the type that wants to find out why, and they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Scrivens</title>
		<link>http://emersian.com/16/you-are-not-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Scrivens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emersian.com/?p=16#comment-28</guid>
		<description>@meme: So having the ability to run makes you a runner? Having the ability to swim makes you a swimmer? Having the ability to sing makes you a singer? If that is how you define traits then you are correct in thinking that everyone is a designer.

@Rusty: I understand most of the &quot;designers&quot; out there don&#039;t have a art background, but what is to stop them from learning? We have the internet at our fingertips and that is a great education enough if you take the time to use it. Add to your library the many great books on design out there and you will find you don&#039;t need to take a painting class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@meme: So having the ability to run makes you a runner? Having the ability to swim makes you a swimmer? Having the ability to sing makes you a singer? If that is how you define traits then you are correct in thinking that everyone is a designer.</p>
<p>@Rusty: I understand most of the &#8220;designers&#8221; out there don&#8217;t have a art background, but what is to stop them from learning? We have the internet at our fingertips and that is a great education enough if you take the time to use it. Add to your library the many great books on design out there and you will find you don&#8217;t need to take a painting class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
